An analysis in favour of a weak NFP:
for weaknesses in the US economy.
After the Fed characterized the growth of economic activity in the US as “strong” at a meeting on Wednesday, it is unlikely that any economic report will surprise the market, even if it beats the forecasts. Therefore, today’s report does not hold much hope, the general Fed tightening course comparing to other Central Banks is now a sufficient driver of growth for the dollar. But do not assume that a negative deviation in the report will also pass unnoticed.
The case below is in favor of the second option.
As was indicated by the ADP report released on Wednesday, the US economy is likely to have maintained a high rate of hiring in July. The growth of jobs according to an unofficial estimate amounted to 219K jobs, which exceeded the forecast of 186K. The indicator of employment from the ISM changed insignificantly in July compared to the previous value of 56.5 points. Values above 50 signal that the economy is in a state of recovery.
High consumer optimism in July (127.1 points) indirectly indicates a possible improvement in pay and a rise in vacancies, since consumers usually closely associate their well-being in the future with rising incomes and the ability to change jobs.
As for unemployment in the US, in July we see the following change of unemployment benefits:
“Fresh” unemployment (initial applications):
Note: the blue line is the actual reading, the purple line is the forecast.
In July, the rate of initial unemployment claims was below projections throughout the month. This suggests that the pace of transition from the category of employed to the unemployed declined faster than expected, which is undoubtedly good for economy. This could indicate one of two things – either the working conditions are good, and wages are sufficiently high which could mean that people are less willing to leave the jobs, or the forcedly stay at work, which is certainly unlikely. In the second scenario, the rate of layoffs is also growing, so if the economic situation worsens, the indicator of initial claims will grow more rapidly.
That is, according to the initial claims report, July proved to be very successful for the labor market.
Now let’s take a look at the “old” unemployment (continued claims):
Throughout July, the indicator exceeded the estimate. It turns out that finding a new job or starting to work was harder for unemployed than expected. Given that some economic reports such as ISM Employment or PMI indicators warned of a growing labor market deficit, a weak indicator of continued claims indicates a “disconnect” in supply and demand-side qualifications. That is, employers, for example, make demand for workers of high qualification, and the labor supply is mainly represented by low-skilled labor force (a common scenario happens). However, what is interesting here is that a structural problem could hinder the growth of wages.
As you probably already know, inflow into the labor force (population 16-64 years) is about 100K per month in the US (supply increment). We add to this number the part of labor force who turned into unemployed and claimed for unemployment benefits for the first time. It turns out that in order not to widen the deficit in the labor market, the remaining new jobs, roughly speaking, should be covered, by a reduction in the previously unemployed (continued claims). We do not take into account the slight fluctuations in the level of participation in the labor force.
Let’s take a look at the change of continued claims for the last three months:
In May – the indicator decreased and was mainly below the forecasts, that month BLS released reports on the growth of employment in almost all sectors. In June, the indicator was also better than expected, with a continued decline, BLS reports a reduction of 21K jobs in the retail sector. In July, we see that the indicator is worse than the forecasts, so we can assume that the Labor Department will indicate a reduction in activity or lack of expansion in several sectors. The forecast for pay and the increase in jobs are respectively moderate.
References to the reports of the Ministry of Labor:
For May: https://www.bls.gov/ces/highlights052018.pdf
For June: https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ceshighlights.pdf
Sector reports will be useful to study in the context of Trump tariffs, for example, slowing employment growth or layoffs in industries that have already been affected by tariffs (for example, steel). It is possible to single out the following sectors, which use steel intensively:
The impact of tariffs has not yet been traced in terms of employment. But as the accommodation is gradual, the reduction in the use of labor cannot follow immediately, and we will explore July for the reaction of firms to tariffs in terms of hiring. Along with the Fed’s bullish position, it is also worth recalling the statements by Powell that “small US firms already feel the tariffs. This is not visible in the aggregated data, but signs of economic discomfort will show up gradually. ”
Today, I’ve presented the case in favor of a weak NFP, which could hinder the growth of the dollar. In general, everything seems to be working out alright for the US economy, and there seems to be no reason for worries, but “smart money” is probably already in search of the first signs of weakness, isn’t it?
Please note that this material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading in the financial markets is very risky.
for weaknesses in the US economy.
After the Fed characterized the growth of economic activity in the US as “strong” at a meeting on Wednesday, it is unlikely that any economic report will surprise the market, even if it beats the forecasts. Therefore, today’s report does not hold much hope, the general Fed tightening course comparing to other Central Banks is now a sufficient driver of growth for the dollar. But do not assume that a negative deviation in the report will also pass unnoticed.
The case below is in favor of the second option.
As was indicated by the ADP report released on Wednesday, the US economy is likely to have maintained a high rate of hiring in July. The growth of jobs according to an unofficial estimate amounted to 219K jobs, which exceeded the forecast of 186K. The indicator of employment from the ISM changed insignificantly in July compared to the previous value of 56.5 points. Values above 50 signal that the economy is in a state of recovery.
High consumer optimism in July (127.1 points) indirectly indicates a possible improvement in pay and a rise in vacancies, since consumers usually closely associate their well-being in the future with rising incomes and the ability to change jobs.
As for unemployment in the US, in July we see the following change of unemployment benefits:
“Fresh” unemployment (initial applications):
Note: the blue line is the actual reading, the purple line is the forecast.
In July, the rate of initial unemployment claims was below projections throughout the month. This suggests that the pace of transition from the category of employed to the unemployed declined faster than expected, which is undoubtedly good for economy. This could indicate one of two things – either the working conditions are good, and wages are sufficiently high which could mean that people are less willing to leave the jobs, or the forcedly stay at work, which is certainly unlikely. In the second scenario, the rate of layoffs is also growing, so if the economic situation worsens, the indicator of initial claims will grow more rapidly.
That is, according to the initial claims report, July proved to be very successful for the labor market.
Now let’s take a look at the “old” unemployment (continued claims):
Throughout July, the indicator exceeded the estimate. It turns out that finding a new job or starting to work was harder for unemployed than expected. Given that some economic reports such as ISM Employment or PMI indicators warned of a growing labor market deficit, a weak indicator of continued claims indicates a “disconnect” in supply and demand-side qualifications. That is, employers, for example, make demand for workers of high qualification, and the labor supply is mainly represented by low-skilled labor force (a common scenario happens). However, what is interesting here is that a structural problem could hinder the growth of wages.
As you probably already know, inflow into the labor force (population 16-64 years) is about 100K per month in the US (supply increment). We add to this number the part of labor force who turned into unemployed and claimed for unemployment benefits for the first time. It turns out that in order not to widen the deficit in the labor market, the remaining new jobs, roughly speaking, should be covered, by a reduction in the previously unemployed (continued claims). We do not take into account the slight fluctuations in the level of participation in the labor force.
Let’s take a look at the change of continued claims for the last three months:
In May – the indicator decreased and was mainly below the forecasts, that month BLS released reports on the growth of employment in almost all sectors. In June, the indicator was also better than expected, with a continued decline, BLS reports a reduction of 21K jobs in the retail sector. In July, we see that the indicator is worse than the forecasts, so we can assume that the Labor Department will indicate a reduction in activity or lack of expansion in several sectors. The forecast for pay and the increase in jobs are respectively moderate.
References to the reports of the Ministry of Labor:
For May: https://www.bls.gov/ces/highlights052018.pdf
For June: https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ceshighlights.pdf
Sector reports will be useful to study in the context of Trump tariffs, for example, slowing employment growth or layoffs in industries that have already been affected by tariffs (for example, steel). It is possible to single out the following sectors, which use steel intensively:
- Construction
- Transport and mechanical engineering
- Infrastructure for Energy
- Packaging
- Household appliances
The impact of tariffs has not yet been traced in terms of employment. But as the accommodation is gradual, the reduction in the use of labor cannot follow immediately, and we will explore July for the reaction of firms to tariffs in terms of hiring. Along with the Fed’s bullish position, it is also worth recalling the statements by Powell that “small US firms already feel the tariffs. This is not visible in the aggregated data, but signs of economic discomfort will show up gradually. ”
Today, I’ve presented the case in favor of a weak NFP, which could hinder the growth of the dollar. In general, everything seems to be working out alright for the US economy, and there seems to be no reason for worries, but “smart money” is probably already in search of the first signs of weakness, isn’t it?
Please note that this material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading in the financial markets is very risky.