Have you ever seen a Forex broker boasting awards like The Best Platform in Eastern Europe or The Best STP Forex Broker? You might think — what's the deal with so many brokers taking pride in so many awards? How are they any representative of quality if every broker has at least dozen of such honors? The fact is, they do not. In the majority of cases, these awards are given by websites or magazines you have never heard of and there are no clear requirements or assessment methodology to get those awards, apart from the organizer's fee of course.
The Guardian has written about some
What is in it for brokers?
Brokers get publicity from such industry accolades in several ways:
- The organizer website is announcing winners.
- The broker brags about the award using their own marketing channels (website, social networks, other advertisement materials).
- Press release and news distribution across industry websites.
All three work on strengthening the image of the brokerage company as a trustworthy firm when, in fact, they more often than not are worthless. Consider this: a
What is in it for the award organizer?
- The money earned from the participants' fees could easily be the main source of the organizer's revenue.
- Publicity generated by the brokers and news websites mentioning the award and its arranger.
All in all, it looks like a
Current situation
All that being said, not all awards are equally useless. Some of them can serve as a sort of a benchmark to assess certain aspects of a broker's profile. We can classify them as follows:
Highest tier — trusted awards. Examples: Barron's or FXStreet (they do not even award brokers!). What unites these award schemes is the transparent and sound methodology. Also, they do not give away hundreds of awards in dozens of categories. Their awards are few but valuable. All these companies earned their reputation before starting to give awards to others.
Medium tier — expos and conventions. Examples: Finance Magnates Summits, iFX Expo, ShowFx World. They have some history and reputation, there are quite strict requirements to participate, and there is competition among participants. Still, such awards should be taken with a grain of salt as they are biased (towards expo participants), often lack real expertise, and their primary goal is promotion.
Lowest tier — dubious awards. All sorts of magazines and broker rating websites come into this category. They provide no transparent judgment criteria, the jury is unknown, and there is often only a small survey to fill in order to get nominated (and get awarded). And there is no shortage of such awards — for example, World Finance magazine alone disbursed 590 trophies in 2015! Such "generosity" depreciates the very idea of an award as some accomplishment — something to be proud of, a sign of exceptional quality, a recognition beyond the plain business success.
Better future
It should be obvious that the industry would benefit a lot if the awards schemes either got regulated or if there would be some form of public rejection of the subpar award programs. A perfect Forex award system would involve a professional expert panel, possibly with representatives from regulatory institutions. Alternatively, or additionally, a survey of qualified traders could be employed as a gauge. It would also require a rigorous process for checking whether the traders are really qualified. They would need to have a real experience of interaction with the researched company, and they would need to be competent enough to draw some comparisons.
As a result, we would have some kind of an industry assessment standard — such an award would really mean something and would really help inexperienced traders to better navigate themselves in the retail Forex business. Unfortunately for now, we are getting used to rather meaningless awards.
If you have anything to say about the awards in the FX trading industry, please proceed to our forum.
